Which assertion is concerned with whether military equipment reported by DoD exists?

The assertion related to whether military equipment reported by the Department of Defense (DoD) truly exists is focused on "Existence." This assertion is fundamental in auditing because it addresses the need for the assets reported in the financial statements to actually be present and capable of being verified. In the context of military equipment, an auditor would evaluate and confirm that the equipment listed in the DoD's records physically exists and is in the possession of the department at the time of the audit.

By confirming existence, auditors can provide assurance that the reported assets are not only accounted for in the financial statements but also that there is a tangible basis for this reporting. This is crucial for maintaining the integrity and reliability of financial reporting for the DoD, ensuring that stakeholders have accurate information regarding the state of military assets.

Other assertions, while important, pertain to different aspects of financial reporting. For example, rights and obligations would relate to whether the DoD has the legitimate right to the equipment, completeness focuses on whether all necessary transactions have been recorded, and valuation concerns the accuracy of the reported value of the equipment.